Mariya G. Sapozhnikova

Postgraduate Student, Assistant of the Department of Universal History

Belgorod State National Research University

(Belgorod, Russia)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22405/2712-8407-2024-2-21-29

Abstract. The article analyzes the Byzantine-Persian conflicts in the era of Theodosius II. The author touches upon the main causes of the enmity between these two great powers – territorial disputes, religious and ideological differences. The main part of the article reveals the changes in Constantinople's foreign policy strategy in the first half of the 5th century. One of the reasons for these transformations was the breakup of the Roman Empire into two parts, Eastern and Western, in 395. This strengthened the parity of Persia and the Eastern Roman Empire. At the same time, new players appeared on the political scene – the Huns, Vandals and other barbaric tribes that threatened both empires. Therefore, in order to minimize military spending, the art of negotiation comes first. Contemporaries of those events interpreted pragmatic necessity as a weakness of Theodosius the Younger, inconsistent with the image of the warrior emperor. The 5th century begins the process of developing early Byzantine diplomacy and adapting it to the challenges of the time. During this period, new officials appeared and existing ones were given special powers (e.g., magister of offices). The conflicts that broke out between the Eastern Roman Empire and the Sassanid Empire in the 420s and 440s indicate that the ‘policy of peace’ was not yet consistent, as well as the presence of a still influential group of ‘militant rigorists’ at the court of Theodosius II.
Keywords: Theodosius II, foreign policy, Early Byzantium, Eastern Roman Empire, Persians, Sassanid Empire, diplomacy.

Full text of the article (PDF)

For citation: Sapozhnikova, MG 2024, ‘The Transformation of Diplomacy During the Reign of Theodosius II (on the Example of Roman-Persian Relations)’, Tula Scientific Bulletin. History. Linguistics, issue 2 (18), pp. 21–29, http://doi.org/10.22405/2712-8407-2024-2-21-29 (in Russ.)

References

1. Aleksandrova, TL 2018, Vizantiyskaya imperatritsa Afinaida-Evdokiya: zhizn i tvorchestvo v kontekste epokhi pravleniya imperatora Feodosiya II (401 – 450) (The Byzantine Empress Athenais-Evdokia: Life and Work in the context of the Reign of Emperor Theodosius II (401 – 450)), Aleteyya publ, St. Petersburg. (In Russ.)
2. Bolgova, AM & Denisova, IV 2015, ‘K istorii obrazovaniya i shkoly v Armenii IV – VII vv.’ (On the history of education and schools in Armenia in the 4th - 7th centuries) in Klassicheskaya i vizantiyskaya traditsiya. 2015: materialy IX mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (Classical and Byzantine Tradition. 2015: Proceedings of the 9th International Scientific Conference), ed. N.N. Bolgov, Belgorod, pp. 157–163. (In Russ.)
3. Dmitriyev, VA 2008, Borba Rimskoy (Vizantiyskoy) imperii i sasanidskogo Irana za preobladaniye v Peredney Azii (III – VII vv.) (The struggle of the Roman (Byzantine) Empire and Sasanian Iran for supremacy in the Near East (3rd – 7th centuries)), PGPU publ, Pskov. (In Russ.)
4. Yuzbashyan, KN (ed.) 1971, Egishe. O Vardane i voyne armyanskoy (Elishe. History of Vardan and the Armenian War at the request of David Mamikonian), trans. I. A. Orbeli, Izdvo AN ArmSSR publ, Erevan. (In Russ.)
5. Yermolova, IE 2010. ‘Ekonomicheskiy aspekt otnosheniy pozdney Rimskoy imperii s vneshnimi narodami’ (The economical aspect of the Later Roman Empire relations with external peoples), RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series, no. 18, pp. 20–32. (In Russ.)
6. Marcellinus Comes 2010, Khronika (Chronicle), trans. N.N. Bolgova, BelGU, tipografiya GiK publ, Belgorod. (In Russ.)
7. Pikin, AV 2018, ‘Tak nazyvayemoye zaveshchaniye imperatora Arkadiya i posolstvo Marufy Mayferkatskogo’ (So-called testimony of the emperor Arcadius and the embassies of Marutha of Maipherkat), Cursor Mundi: chelovek Antichnosti, Srednevekovya i Vozrozhdeniya, no. 10, pp. 53–60. (In Russ.)
8. Barnes, TD 1985, ‘Constantine and the Christians of Persia’, Journal of Roman Studies, vol. 75, pp. 126–136.
9. Blockley, RC 1992, East Roman Foreign Policy: Formation and Conduct from Diocletian to Anastasius, Cairns publ, Leeds.
10. Reiske, J (ed.) 2012, Constantine VII. De ceremoniis (The Book of Ceremonies), Australian Association for Byzantine Studies publ, Canberra.
11. Ferdowsi 2006, Shahnameh: The Persian Book of Kings, trans. D. Davis, Viking publ.
12. Holum, KG 1977, ‘Pulcheria᾽s Crusade a.d. 421 – 422 and the Ideology of Imperial Victory’, Greek-Roman and Byzantine Studies, no.18, pp. 153–172.
13. Ioannis Malalae 2000, ‘Chronographia’, Corpus Fontium Historiae Byzantinae. Series Berolinensis 35, Berlin, New York.
14. Lee, AD 2008, ‘Treaty-Making in Late Antiquity’, War and Peace in Ancient and Medieval History, Cambridge University Press publ, Cambridge, pp. 107–119.
15. Seeck, O (ed.) 1905, Notitia Dignitatum, Wiedmann publ, Berlin.
16. Hussey, R (ed.) 1878, Socrates. Ecclesiastical History, Clarendon Press publ, Oxford.
17. Hasen, GGh (ed.) 1995, Sozomenus. Kirchengeschichte, Berlin. (In German)
18. The Chronicle of Marcellinus: a translation and commentary: (with a reproduction of Mommsen's edition of the text) 1995, Australian Association for Byzantine Studies publ, Sydney.
19. The fragmentary history of Priscus: Attila, the Huns and the Roman Empire, AD 430 – 476. Christian Roman Empire series 2014, vol. 11, Merchantville NJ.
20. Theodoret 1954, ‘Kirchengeschichte’, Die griechischen christlichen Schriftsteller, Berlin. (In German)