ISSN (Online) 2712-8407
DOI: 10.22405/2712-8407

THE THESSALIAN FAILURE OF PHILIP II: LOCAL DEFEAT AS AN INCENTIVE TO DEVELOPMENT


Alexander A. Kleymenov

Doctor of Science (History), Senior researcher of the Department of history and archaeology of the Tula State Lev Tolstoy Pedagogical University

Tula State Lev Tolstoy Pedagogical University

(Tula, Russia)



Abstract. The circumstances, reasons and results of Phillip’s army defat in military campaign in 354 BC are under consideration in this article. Trying to control Thessaly, Phillip responded to request of the Thessalian city coalition about support against the ruler of Pherae Lycophron. The ruler of Pherae Lycophron asked the of support of Phocis Onomarchus’ tyrant who was the main Phillip’s enemy in struggle for domination in Thessaly. The result of military campaign 354 BC was the win of the Phocians and Phillip army’s retreat to Macedonia. The main result of this defeat was demoralization of Macedonian army. Big role in that situation had Onomarchus’ skillful actions which could trap enemy and use catapults in field battle. The important thing was that Macedonian command had some miscalculation and underestimate their enemy started the attack without having any intelligent data. They had the tactic mistake in using phalanx without cavalry support and in unsuitable territory. The reason of Phillip army’s demoralization was unfinished building new Macedonian army processed and warriors did not have enough discipline. But that defeat did not destroy the main army forces of Macedonia. Considering these mistakes Phillip had revenge next year in the battle of Crocus Field. The defeat of 354 BC gave the big stimulus to the next developing of Macedonian army showed to Phillip and his associators the dangerous of rash decisions, using inelegant data and coordinated use of infantry and cavalry in battle such as assistance some problems in military discipline.
Keywords: Philip II, Onomarchus, Thessaly, warfare, Macedonian phalanx.

Full text of the article (PDF)

For citation:Kleymenov, АА 2020, ‘The Thessalian failure of Philip II: local defeat as an incentive to development’, Tula Scientific Bulletin. History. Linguistics, issue 2 (2), pp. 6–19, URL: http://tula-vestnik.ru/pdf/2020/vipusk_2_15_12_20.pdf (in Russ.)

References

1. Borza E. N. Istoriya antichnoy Makedonii (do Aleksandra Velikogo) [The history of ancient Macedonia (before Alexander the Great)] transl. from English by M. M. Kholod. St. Petersburg: history Department of St. Petersburg state University, Nestoristoria Publ., 2013. 591 p. (In Russ.)
2. Zemtsov V. N. Napoleon v Borodinskom srazhenii (opyt mikroistoricheskogo issledovaniya) [Napoleon in the battle of Borodino (experience in micro-historical research)]. Otechestvennaya vojna 1812 goda. Istochniki. Pamyatniki. Problemy: Materialy VIII Vserossijskoj nauchnoj konferencii (Borodino, 6-7 sentyabrya 1999 g.). Mozhaysk: Terra Publ., 2000. Pp. 56-84. (In Russ.)
3. Kasymov F. O. et al. Mekhanicheskaya travma organa zreniya: uchebnoye posobiye [Mechanical trauma of the eyesight organ: a tutorial]. St. Petersburg: Publishing house of the North-Western State Medical University named after I.I Mechnikov, 2015. 51 p. (In Russ.)
4. Nefedkin A. K. Konnitsa epokhi ellinizma [Hellenistic сavalry]. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, 2019. 784 p. (In Russ.)
5. СDanilichev V. F. Sovremennaya oftal'mologiya: Rukovodstvo [Modern ophthalmology: a guide]. 2nd ed. St. Petersburg: Piter Publ., 688 p. (In Russ.)
6. Worthington I. Filipp Makedonskiy [Philip II of Macedonia] transl. from English by S. V. Ivanov. St. Petersburg, Moscow: Klio Publ., 2014. 397 p. (In Russ.)
7. Frolov E. D. Gretsiya v epokhu pozdney klassiki (Obshchestvo. Lichnost'. Vlast') [Greece in the late classical times (Society. Personality. Power)]. St. Petersburg, Publishing center “Academy of the Humanities”, 2001. 602 p. (In Russ.)
8. Anson E. M. Alexander the Great: Themes and Issues. London – New York: Bloomsbury, 2013. 226 p.
9. Ashley J. R. The Macedonian Empire: The Era of Warfare under Philip II and Alexander the Great, 359-323 BC. Jefferson: McFarland, 1998. 486 p.
10. Bartsiokas A The eye injury of King Philip II and the skeletal evidence from the Royal Tomb II at Vergina // Science. 2000. Vol. 288. P 511-514.
11. Beloch K. J. Griechische Geschichte. Bd. III. Аbt. 2. Bis auf Aristoteles und die Eroberung Asiens. Leipzig – Berlin: Walter De Gruyter, 1923. 528 s.
12. Buckler J. Philip II and the Sacred War. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1989. 212 p.
13. Carney E. King and Court in Ancient Macedonia: Rivalry, Treason and Conspiracy. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales, 2015. 326 p.
14. Cawkwell G. Philip of Macedon. London – Boston: Faber & Faber, 1978. 215 p.
15. Ehrhardt С. Two Notes on Philip of Macedon's First Interventions in Thessaly // Classical Quarterly. n.s. 1967. Vol. 17. No. 2. P. 296-301.
16. Ellis J. R. Philip II and Macedonian Imperialism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976. 312 p.
17. Engels J. Philipp II. und Alexander der Große. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2007. 125 s.
18. English S. Mercenaries in the Classical World to the Death of Alexander. Barnsley: Pen & Sword Military, 2012. 460 p.
19. Errington R. M. A History of Macedonia. Berkeley – Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1990. 515 p.
20. Ferrill A. The Origins of War: from the Stone Age to Alexander the Great. Boulder: Westview Press, 1997. 240 p.
21. Gabriel R. A. Man and Wound in the Ancient World: A History of Military Medicine from Sumer to the Fall of Constantinople. Washington: Potomac Books, 2012. 267 p.
22. Gabriel R. A. Philip II of Macedonia: Greater than Alexander. Washington: Potomac Books, 2010. 303 p.
23. Gaebel R. E. Cavalry Operations in the Ancient Greek World. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2002. 345 p.
24. Greenwalt W.S. Thracian and Macedonian Kingship // A Companion to Ancient Thrace / edited by J. Valeva, E. Nankov, D. Graninger. Malden – Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2015. P. 337-351.
25. Griffith G. T. Philip of Macedon's Early Interventions in Thessaly (358–352 B.C.) // Classical Quarterly. n.s. 1970. Vol. 20. No. 1. P. 67-80.
26. Griffith G. T. The Mercenaries of the Hellenistic World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1935. 337 p.
27. Griffith G. T. The Reign of Philip the Second // Hammond N.G.L., Griffith G.T. A History of Macedonia. Vol. II: 550–336 BC. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979. P. 201-646.
28. Hammond N. G. L. Diodorus' Narrative of the Sacred War and the Chronological Problems of 357-352 B. C. // Journal of Hellenic Studies. 1937. Vol. 57. Pt. 1. P. 44-78.
29. Hammond N. G. L. Philip of Macedon. London: Duckworth, 1994. 235 p.
30. Hammond N. G. L. The Sources of Diodorus Siculus XVI // Classical Quarterly. 1938. Vol. 32. No. 3-4. P. 137-151.
31. Hammond N. G. L. Training in the Use of a Sarissa and its Effect in Battle, 359 - 333 B. C. // Antichthon. 1980. Vol. 14. P. 53-63.
32. Hanson V. D. The Western Way of War: Infantry Battle in Classical Greece. New York: Knopf, 1989. 245 p.
33. Hornblower S. The Greek world, 479–323 BC. London – New York: Routledge, 2011. 410 p.
34. Jones-Lewis M. Pharmacy // A Companion to Science, Technology, and Medicine in Ancient Greece and Rome. Vol. 1 / edited by G.L. Irby. Malden – Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2016. P. 402-417.
35. Keyser P.T. The Use of Artillery by Philip II and Alexander the Great // The Ancient World. 1994. Vol. 25. No. 1. P. 27-59.
36. Konijnendijk R. Classical Greek Tactics: A Cultural History. Leiden – Boston: Brill, 2017. 261 p.
37. Lascaratos J., Lascaratos G., Kalantzis G. The Ophthalmic Wound of Philip II of Macedonia (360–336 BCE) // Survey of Ophtalmology. 2004. Vol. 49. P. 256-261.
38. Londey P. Philip and the Delphic Amphiktyony // Ancient Macedonia: an Australian symposium (Mediterranean Archaeology 7) / edited by P.J. Connor. Sydney: University of Sydney, 1995. P. 25-34.
39. Martin T. R. A Phantom Fragment of Theopompus and Philip II’s First Campaign in Thessaly // Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. 1982. Vol. 86. P. 55-78.
40. Martin T. R. Diodorus on Philip II and Thessaly in the 350s B.C. // Classical Philology. 1981. Vol. 76. No. 3. P. 188-201.
41. Musgrave J. H., Neave R. A. H., Prag A. J. N. W. The Skull from Tomb II at Vergina: King Philip II of Macedon // Journal of Hellenic Studies. 1984. Vol. 104. P. 60-78.
42. Nutton V. Ancient Medicine. London – New York: Routledge, 2004. 486 p.
43. Ober J. Early Artillery Towers: Messenia, Boiotia, Attica, Megarid // American Journal of Archaeology. 1987. Vol. 91. No. 4. P. 569-604.
44. Pickard A. W. The Rice of Macedonia // The Cambridge Ancient History. Vol. VI / edited by J. B. Bury, S. A. Cook, F. E. Edcock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1933. P. 200-243.
45. Prag A. J. N. W Reconstructing King Philip II: The “nice” version // American Journal of Archaeology. 1990. Vol. 94. P. 237-247.
46. Riginos A. S. The Wounding of Philip II of Macedon: Fact and Fabrication // Journal of Hellenic Studies. 1994. Vol. 114. P. 106-114.
47. Schubert R. Untersuchungen über die Quellen zur Geschichte Philipps II. von Macedonien. Königsberg: Gräfe und Unzer, 1904. 68 s.
48. Sprawski S. The End of the Pheraean Tyranny // ΥΠΕΡΕΙΑ. 2010. T. 5. P. 181-189.
49. Tarn W. W. Hellenistic Military and Naval Developments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1930. 170 p.
50. Uhlemann K. Untersuchungen über die Quellen der Geschichte Philipps von Makedonien und des heiligen Krieges im 16. Buche Diodors. Straßburg: M. Du Mont Schauberg, 1913. 119 s.
51. Vela Tejada J., Martín García F. (ed.) Eneas el Táctico: Poliorcética; Polieno: Estratagemas. Madrid: Editorial Credo, 1991. 614 p.
52. Westlake H. D. Thessaly in the fourth century B.C. London: Methuen, 1935. 248 p.
53. Wilcken U. Griechische Geschichte im Rahmen der Altertumsgeschichte. München: R. Oldenburg, 1962. 380 s.
54. Wooten C. A Commentary on Demosthenes Philippic I: With Rhetorical Analyses of Philippics II and III. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. 179 p.
55. Worthington I. The Aspiring Politician // Demosthenes: statesman and orator / edited by I. Worthington. London – New York: Routledge, 2000. P. 98-128.
56. Wrightson, G. Macedonia armies and the perfection of Combined Arms // Greece, Macedon and Persia: Studies in Social, Political and Military History in Honour of Waldemar Heckel / edited by T. Howe, E. E. Garvin, G. Wrightson. Oxford – Philadelphia: Oxbow Books, 2014. P. 59–68.