Larisa D. Bednarskaya

Doctor of Sciences (Philology), Professor, Professor of the Russian Language Department

Oryol State University named after I. S. Turgenev

(Orel, Russia)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22405/2712-8407-2024-4-139-149

Abstract. The article analyzes the scientific achievements of Professor A. N. Karpov, Doctor of Philology, in the field of research of "multicomponent unities" – structures consisting of several sentences united by one theme and syntactic coherence. A. N. Karpov's works have made a great contribution to the study of the linguistics of the text, his ideas have been continued in modern works on the complex syntactic whole (CCC) – the highest unit of syntax, on its forms and functions of the semantic part of the whole text. In modern linguistics, the CCC is analyzed as a transitional structure between a complex multicomponent sentence and a text, between a sentence and an attached part that has been disconnected for the purpose of actualization (attachment, parcellation). A. N. Karpov's fruitful development of the structure of the period also continues, the study of which turned out to be extremely relevant in the context of studying the structural, semantic and philological analysis of literary text. It turned out that the type of CCC is also related to its content, it is within its boundaries that a description, narrative, and sometimes reasoning are formed. The variants of the combination of structurestypes in the CCC determine the idiosyncrasy of the writer. Keywords are distributed in the structure of the text by semantic parts, thematically linking them. Awareness of the integrity of the semantic part is associated with the allocation of keywords in it, thematically "stitching" it. The first sentence of the semantic part contains words with a generalized meaning, which is revealed in subsequent sentences using pronouns, single-root words, synonyms, antonyms, etc. It became possible to distinguish the narrative and the actual narrative within the plot. The narrative is more abstract, voluminous, broader: This is a text that conveys information about real or fictional events taking place in a time sequence, and the linguistic means that organize it are broader than just narratives. For example, the narrative of Pushkin's prose is dense, it is as informative as possible: behind each sentence of such a narrative there is a voluminous cultural, historical and plot context, an apperceptive background, this movement of life itself. In conclusion, the signs of a complex syntactic whole are listed.
Keywords: "multicomponent unities" as a prototype of a complex syntactic whole, transitional structures, formation of text types and author's idiosyncrasy.

Full text of the article (PDF)

For citation: Bednarskaya, LD 2024, ‘On the Development of A. N. Karpov's Syntactic Ideas in the XXI Century’, Tula Scientific Bulletin. History. Linguistics, issue 4 (20), pp. 139–149, http://doi.org/10.22405/2712-8407-2024-4-139-149 (in Russ.)

References

1. Arutyunova, ND 1976, Predlozheniye i yego smysl: logiko-semanticheskiye problem (The sentence and its meaning), Nauka publ, Moscow. (In Russ.)
2. Babaytseva, VV 2010, ‘Razvitiye idey traditsionnogo yazykoznaniya v strukturnosemanticheskom sintaksise’ (Development of ideas of traditional linguistics in structural and semantic syntax), Izbrannoye, 2005-2010 (Selected, 2005-2010), Izd-vo SGU publ, Moscow, Stavropol, pp. 76-96. (In Russ.)
3. Babaytseva, VV 2013, Russkiy yazyk: 10-11 klass (Russian language. Grades 10-11), Drofa publ, Moscow. (In Russ.)
4. Babaytseva, VV 2015, Sintaksis russkogo yazyka (Syntax of the Russian language), Flinta publ, Nauka publ, Moscow. (In Russ.)
5. Bednarskaya, LD 2014, Zakonomernosti grammaticheskogo chleneniya mnogokomponentnogo slozhnog o predlozheniya (Patterns of grammatical division of a multicomponent complex sentence), Flinta publ, Nauka publ, Moscow. (In Russ.)
6. Bednarskaya, LD 2019, Slozhnoye sintaksicheskoye tseloye i tekst (Complex syntactic whole and text), Flinta publ, Nauka publ, Moscow. (In Russ.)
7. Vinogradov,VV 1963, Stilistika. Teoriya poeticheskoy rechi. Poetika (Stylistics. Theory of poetic speech. Poetics), Izd-vo AN SSSR publ, Moscow. (In Russ.)
8. Dibrova, YeI 2008, ‘Khudozhestvennyy tekst: Struktura. Soderzhaniye. Smysl’ (Literary text. Structure. Content. Meaning), Izbrannyye raboty: v 2 t. (Selected works. In 2 vols.), vol. 1, TVT Divizion publ, Moscow. (In Russ.)
9. Karpov, AN 2003, ‘Stilisticheskiye funktsii periodov v proizvedeniyakh L'va Tolstogo (iz knigi «Stilisticheskiy sintaksis» L. Tolstogo)’ (Stylistic functions of periods in the works of Leo Tolstoy (from the book ‘Stylistic syntax’ by L. Tolstoy), Rusistika: problemy, dostizheniya, perspektivy (Russian studies: problems, achievements, prospects), ed. G. V. Tokarev, Izdvo Tul. gos. ped. un-ta im. L.N. Tolstogo, Tula, pp. 65-74. (In Russ.)
10. Karpov, AN 1981, Polikomponentnyye yedinstva russkoy emfaticheskoy rechi (Multicomponent unities of Russian emphatic speech), Tul. ped. in-t publ, Tula. (In Russ.)
11. Kozhina, MN 1968, K osnovaniyam funktsionalnoy stilistiki (On the foundations of functional stylistics), Izd-vo Permskogo un-ta publ, Perm. (In Russ.)
12. Nikolina, NA 2001, ‘Slozhnoye sintaksicheskoye tseloye’ (A complex syntactic whole), Sovremennyy russkiy yazyk Teoriya. Analiz yazykovykh yedinits (Modern Russian language. Theory. Analysis of linguistic units), ed. Ye. I. Dibrova, part 2, ACADEMIA publ, Moscow, pp. 560–586. (In Russ.)
13. Pospelov, NS 1948, ‘Problema slozhnogo sintaksicheskogo tselogo v sovremennom russkom yazyke’ (The problem of a complex syntactic whole in modern Russian), Memoirs of the Faculty of Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, no. 137, pp. 36-48. (In Russ.)
14. Pospelov, NS 1950, ‘O grammaticheskoy prirode slozhnogo predlozheniya’ (On the grammatical nature of a complex sentence), Voprosy sintaksisa sovremennogo russkogo yazyka (Issues of syntax of the modern Russian language), Izd-vo MGU publ, Moscow, pp. 321-327. (In Russ.)
15. Solganik, GYa 1981, ‘K probleme tipologii rechi’ (On the problem of typology of speech), Voprosy Jazykoznanija, no. 4, pp. 70-79. (In Russ.)
16. Figurovskiy, IA 1948, ‘Ot sintaksisa otdel'nogo predlozheniya – k sintaksisu tselogo teksta’ (From the syntax of a single sentence to the syntax of the whole text), Russian language at school, no. 3, pp. 21-31. (In Russ.)
17. Figurovskiy, IA 1961, Sintaksis tselogo teksta i uchenicheskiye pismennyye raboty (Syntax of the whole text and student written works), Uchpedgiz publ, Moscow. (In Russ.)