Andrey V. Bezrukov

PhD in Historical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of World History

Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University

(Magnitogorsk, Russia)

Vladislav V. Ulitin

PhD in Historical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of World History and International Relations

Kuban State University

(Krasnodar, Russia)

Elizaveta S. Kucherenko

Student of the Institute of Humanities Education

Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University

(Magnitogorsk, Russia)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22405/2712-8407-2025-1-8-19

Abstract. The aim of the study is to characterize the issues of comparing written and archaeological sources in studying the impact of military and political factors on the Greco-Barbarian trade using the example of the Kuban region and the interfluve of the Volga and the Ural as the near and far barbarian periphery of the ancient world, respectively. Four groups of issues are identified and characterized. The first group is associated with the reflection of information on the dynamics of trade and the dynamics of military and political events. The second group includes issues associated with dating military and political events and changes in trade based on archaeological material. The third group includes issues of localizing toponyms and ethnonyms and ethnocultural attribution of archaeological sites and cultures. The fourth group includes issues of establishing probable cause-and-effect relationships between the action of military and political factors and the dynamics of trade. The general issues of comparing data from archaeological and written sources for the four groups described are related to the specifics of their various categories, the degree and features of the reflection of information on the dynamics of trade and military and political events and processes. The features and possibilities of comparison revealed for each of the regions, the Kuban region and interfluve of the Volga and the Ural, are related to the specifics of a certain range of written and archaeological sources, the degree and features of the reflection of information of a "military" and "trade" nature. They, in turn, were influenced by the differences between these regions of an ethnic, geographical, economic-cultural, military-political nature, as well as the degree and nature of their involvement in ancient trade and military and political events in the ancient world.
Keywords: Kuban region, interfluve of the Volga and the Ural, Greco-Barbarian trade, military and political factors, Meotians, Sarmatians, issues of comparing data from written and archaeological sources, 4th century BC – 2nd century AD.

Full text of the article (PDF)

For citation: Bezrukov, AV, Ulitin, VV & Kucherenko, ES 2025, ‘Military and Political Factors and the Greco-Barbarian Trade: Issues of Comparing Data from Written and Archaeological Sources (on the Example of the Kuban Region and the Interfluve of the Volga and the Ural)’, Tula Scientific Bulletin. History. Linguistics, issue 1 (21), pp. 8–19, https://doi.org/10.22405/2712-8407-2025-1-8-19 (in Russ.)

References

1. Abramzon, MG & Novichikhin, AM 2014, ‘Dva monetnykh klada Mitridatovskogo vremeni s yugo-vostochnoy okrainy Bospora (2014 g.)’ (Two Hoards of the Mithridatic Period from the Southeastern Outlying Districts of the Bosporus (2014)), Vestnik drevnei istorii (Journal of Ancient History), vol. 78, no 2, pp. 333–348 (in Russ.)
2. Akbulatov, IM 1999, Ekonomika rannikh kochevnikov Yuzhnogo Urala (Economy of Early Nomads of the Southern Ural), National Museum of the Republic of Bashkortostan publ, Ufa. (in Russ.)
3. Anfimov, NV 1966, ‘Denezhnoe obrashchenie na Elizavetinskom gorodishche – emporii Bospora na Srednei Kubani’ (Monetary Circulation at the Elizavetinsky Town-site, the Emporium of Bosporus in the Central Kuban), Vestnik drevnei istorii (Journal ofAncient History), no 2, pp. 157–165. (in Russ.)
4. Aptekarev, AZ 1989, ‘K voprosu o vostochnoi granitse Bosporskogo tsarstva vo vtoroi polovine IV – pervoi polovine III v. do n.e.’ (To the question of the eastern border of the Bosporan kingdom in the second half of the 4th - the first half of the 3rd century. BC.) in Pervaya kubanskaya arkheologicheskaya konferentsiya (First Kuban archaeological conference), abstracts, Krasnodar, 1989, pp. 63–65. (in Russ.)
5. Berlizov, NE 2014, ‘K voprosu o sushchestvovanii sirako-meotskogo plemennogo soyuza’ (On the existence of siraco-meotian tribal alliance), Kul'turnaya zhizn' Yuga Rossii (Cultural Studies of Russian South), no 2, pp. 72–75. (in Russ.)
6. Blavatskiy, VD 1969, ‘O rabakh-meotakh’ (About Meotians as slaves), Kratkie soobshcheniia Instituta arkheologii (Brief Communications of the Institute of Archaeology), iss. 116, pp. 68–69 (in Russ.)
7. Brashinskiy, IB 1973, ‘Pontiyskoye piratstvo’ (Pontic Piracy), Vestnik drevney istorii (Journal of Ancient History), no 3, pp. 124–133. (in Russ.)
8. Brashinskiy, IB 1984, Metody issledovaniya antichnoi torgovli (na primere Severnogo Prichernomor'ya) (Research Methods of Ancient Trade (on the example of the northern Black Sea region), Nauka publ., Leningrad. (in Russ.)
9. Brashinskiy, IB 1984, ‘Torgovlya’ (Trade), in GA Koshelenko (ed.) Antichnye gosudarstva Severnogo Prichernomor’ya (Ancient States of the Northern Pontic Region), Nauka publ, Moscow, pp. 174–186 (in Russ.)
10. Vasil'ev, VN 2001, Vooruzhenie i voennoe delo kochevnikov Yuzhnogo Urala v VI–II vv. do nashey ery (Weaponry and Warfare of the nomads of the Southern Urals in the 6th–2nd centuries BC), Gilem publ, Ufa. (in Russ.)
11. Vinogradov YuA 2009, ‘Migratsii kochevnikov Evrazii i nekotorye osobennosti istoricheskogo razvitiya Bospora Kimmeriiskogo’ (Migrations of nomads in Eurasia and some peculiar features in the historical development of the Cimmerian Bosporus), Bosporskie issledovaniya (Bosporos studies), 2009, vol. XXII, pp. 5–90. (in Russ.)
12. Vinogradov, YuA & Goroncharovskii, VA 2009, Voennaya istoriya i voennoe delo Bospora Kimmeriiskogo (VI v. do n.e. — seredina III v. n.e.) (Military History and Warfare of Cimmerian Bosporus (6th Century BC – Middle 3rd Century AD), Nestor-Istoriya publ., Saint Petersburg, (in Russ.)
13. Grakov, BN 1939, ‘Materialy po istorii Skifii v grecheskikh nadpisiakh Balkanskogo poluostrova i Maloy Azii’ (Materials on the history of Scythia in Greek inscriptions of the Balkan Peninsula and Asia Minor), Vestnik drevney istorii (Journal of Ancient History), no 3, pp. 231–312. (in Russ.)
14. Ivanov, AV & Sudarev, NI, ‘Arifarn – tsar' frakiytsev’ (Arifarnes, the king of the Thracians), in VYu Zuev & VA Khrshanovskiy (eds.), Bosporskiy fenomen. Obschee i osobennoe v istorikokulturnom prostranstve antichnogo mira. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. (The Bosporan Phenomenon. General and Peculiar Features of Historical and Cultural Space in the World of Classical Antiquity. Proceedings of the International Conference), pt. 2, Publishing and Printing Center of Saint Petersburg State University of Industrial Technologies and Design, Saint Petersburg, pp. 48–55. (in Russ.)
15. Kamenetskiy, IS 2011, Istoriya izucheniya meotov (History of Maeots Studies), Taus publ, Moscow. (in Russ.)
16. Kitov, EP., Khokhlov, AA & Ivanov, SS 2019, ‘Boevye travmy u rannikh kochevnikov «savromato-sarmatskogo» oblika kak otrazheniye sotsial'no-politicheskoy obstanovki v stepnoy polose Evrazii v VI–II vv. do n.e.’ (Combat Injuries of the Early Nomads of the ‘Savromatian-Sarmatian’ Appearance as a Reflection of the Social and Political Situation in the Steppes of Eurasia in 6th–2nd cc. BC), Stratum plus, no 3, pp. 169–180. (in Russ.)
17. Klein, LS 2013, Arkheologicheskoye issledovaniye: Metodika kabinetnoy raboty arkheologa (Archaeological research: Cabinet methods of an archaeologist), vol. 2, Donetsk National University publ., Donetsk. (in Russ).
18. Koshelenko, GA, Malyshev, AA & Ulitin, VV 2010, ‘Torgovlya’ (Trade) in GM Bongard-Levin & VD Kuznetsov (eds.), Antichnoye naslediye Kubani (Ancient Heritage of Kuban), vol. 2., Nauka publ., Moscow, pp. 256–289. (in Russ.)
19. Kuznetsov, VD 2000, ‘Afiny i Bospor: khlebnaya torgovlya’ (Athens and Bosporus: grain trade), Rossiyskaya arkheologiya (Russian archaeology), no 1, pp. 107–120. (in Russ.)
20. Limberis, NYu & Marchenko, II 2010, ‘Meoty’ (Meotians), in GM Bongard-Levin & VD Kuznetsov (eds.) Antichnoye nasledie Kubani (Ancient Heritage of Kuban), vol. 1, Nauka publ, Moscow, pp. 186–217. (in Russ).
21. Limberis, NYu & Marchenko, II 2010, ‘Sarmaty’ (Sarmatians) in GM Bongard-Levin & VD Kuznetsov (eds.), Antichnoe nasledie Kubani (Ancient Heritage of Kuban), Vol. 1, Nauka publ., Moscow, pp. 260–284. (in Russ.)
22. Molev, EA 1995, Vlastitel’ Ponta (The sovereign of Pontus), Nizhniy Novgorod State University, Nizhniy Novgorod. (in Russ.)
23. Molev, EA 2009, ‘Skify v politicheskoy istorii Bospora VI–II vv. do n.e.’ (Тhe Scythians in the Political History of Bosporus of the 6th–2nd Centuries ВС), Vestnik drevney istorii (Journal of Ancient History), no 3, pp. 155–165.
24. Monakhov, SYu, Marchenko, II, Limberis, NYu, Kuznetsova, EV & Churekova, NB 2021, Amfory Prikubanskogo nekropolya IV – nachala III v. do n.e. (iz sobraniya Krasnodarskogo gosudarstvennogo istoriko-arkheologicheskogo muzeya-zapovednika imeni E.D. Felitsyna) (Amphorae of the Prikubanskiy necropolis of the 4th – early 3rd century BC (from the collection of the Krasnodar State Historical and Archaeological Museum-Reserve named after E.D. Felitsyn)), OOO ‘Volga’ publ, Saratov. (in Russ.)
25. Polin, SV & Simonenko, AV 1997, ‘Skifiya i sarmaty’ (Scythia and Sarmatians), Donskiye drevnosti (Antiquities of the Don), iss. 5, pp. 87—98 (in Russ.)
26. Simonenko, AV 2014, ‘Shlemy sarmatskogo vremeni iz Vostochnoy Evropy’ (Sarmatian Age Helmets from Eastern Europe), Stratum plus, no 4, pp. 249–284. (in Russ.)
27. Skripkin, AS 2010, Sarmaty i Vostok. Sbornik izbrannykh trudov A.S. Skripkina (Sarmatians and the East. A.S. Skripkin’s Selected Works). Volgograd State University, Volgograd. (in Russ.)
28. Skripkin, AS 2017, Sarmaty (The Sarmatians), Volgograd State University publ, Volgograd. (in Russ.)
29. Ulitin, VV 2006, ‘Rol' Prikuban'ya v ekonomicheskoy istorii antichnogo mira’ (The role of the Kuban region in the economic history of the ancient world), in VV Dementeva (ed.) Antichnaya istoriya i klassicheskaya arkheologiya (Ancient history and classical archeology), Institute of General History of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, pp. 128–137. (in Russ.)
30. Ulitin, VV 2020, ‘Epitafiya na nadgrobii kuptsa Khrestiona iz Pantikapeya (KBN 142): problema interpretatsii’ (The epitaph on the tombstone of the merchant Chrestion from Panticapaeum (CIRB 142): interpretations problems) in AG Ivanov (ed.), Problemy issledovaniya zarubezhnoy istorii (Problems and foreign history studies: collection of scientific works), Kuban State University publ, Krasnodar, pp. 12–20. (in Russ.)
31. Ulitin, VV. 2024, ‘Reka Kuban' kak faktor torgovli v antichnuyu epokhu’ (The Kuban river as a factor of trade in the antique period), in VV. Kasyanov & OV Matveev (eds.) Voprosy istorii i kul'tury Severnogo Kavkaza, kazachestv Yuga Rossii (k 85-letiyu professora V.N. Ratushnyaka): sbornik nauchnykh statey (Historical and cultural problems of the North Caucasus, the Cossacks of the South of Russia (on the 85th Anniversary of Professor V.N. Ratushnyak): Collection of Scientific Articles), Kuban State University publ, Krasnodar, pp. 170–184. (in Russ.)
32. Shevchenko, NF 2004, ‘Vinogradnyy 1 – poseleniye epokhi ellinizma v stepnom Zakuban'ye’ (Vinogradny 1 – a settlement of the Hellenistic period in the Trans-Kuban region steppe) in V Bosporskiye chteniya. Bospor Kimmeriyskiy i varvarskiy mir v period antichnosti i srednevekov'ya. Etnicheskiye protsessy: Sbornik nauchnykh materialov V Bosporskikh chteniy, Kerch', 20–24 maya 2004 goda (5th Bosporus readings. Cimmerian Bosporus and the barbarian world in antiquity and the Middle Ages. Ethnic processes: Collection of scientific materials of the 5th Bosporus readings, Kerch, May 20–24, 2004), BF ‘Demeter’ publ. Kerch, pp. 414–419. (in Russ.)
33. Shevchenko, NF 2013, Plemena Vostochnogo Priazov'ya na rubezhe ery (Tribes of the East Azov Sea Shore on the Turn of Erae), Al'tair publ., Rostov-on-Don. (in Russ.)
34. Shelov, DB 1970, Tanais i Nizhniy Don v III–I vv. do n. e. (Tanais and Lower Don in 3rd – 1st Centuries BC), Nauka publ, Moscow. (in Russ.)
35. Vencl, Sl 1984, ‘War and Warfare in Archaeology’. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, no 3, pp. 153–168.
36. Monachov, SJu & Kuznetsova, EV 2017, ‘Overseas trade in the Black Sea from the Archaic to the Hellenistic period’, in V Kozlovskaya (ed.), The Northern Black Sea in Antiquity: Networks, Connectivity, and Cultural Interactions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 59–99.
37. Simonenko, AV, Marčenko, II & Limberis, NJu 2008, Römische Importe in sarmatischen und maiotischen Gräbern zwischen Unterer Donau und Kuban (Roman imports in Sarmatian and Maiotic Tombs between the Lower Danube and the Kuban), vol. 25, Archäologie in Eurasien (Archeology in Eurasia), German Archaeological Institute publ., Mainz (in Germ.)