Ekaterina Yu. Yadykina

Master student of the Chair of Russian Language and Literature, Tula State Lev Tolstoy Pedagogical University

Tula State Lev Tolstoy Pedagogical University

(Tula, Russia)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22405/2712-8407-2021-3-106

Abstract. The paper develops the postulate about the reflection of the features of the cultural code in the dialect word. The language is a part of the national identity, and the dialect speech reflects the dialect language picture of the world. Dialectisms represent the aspects of the everyday life of people living in a certain territory, their spiritual values and historical events that happened on that territory. The article deals with the issue of understanding of dialectisms denoting human qualities by modern residents of the Tula region. The work compares the meanings of lexemes recorded in the Dictionary of Russian folk dialects (Slovar' russkikh narodnykh govorov) and existing in the territory of the dialect. In the course of the study, an experiment was conducted, the results of which are presented in the work. The author used the dialectisms recorded on the territory of the Arsenyevsky district of the Tula region. It turned out that the understanding of dialectisms by modern people depends on such factors as age, level of education and place of residence. For example, schoolchildren performed worse on the task than adults. In this case, the role of developed reading skills, linguistic flair, the volume of vocabulary and everyday experience is important. The level of education was paid special. It turned out that people who received a secondary education were less likely to make mistakes than those with a higher education. One can assume that the former are more focused on practical activities, more often hear vernacular and colloquial speech, which is not strange for them. Finally, the place of residence influences the understanding of a dialect. City dwellers made mistakes more often than the inhabitants of the periphery did. It is obvious that the dialects are preserved in the territories located far from the center. People who live in large, small villages and in small towns hear dialectisms more often.
Keywords: dialecticism, semantics, culture, dialectal language picture of the world, sociolinguistics.

Full text of the article (PDF)

For citation: Yadykina, EY 2021, ‘The study in modern conditions of dialect vocabulary, which names the qualities of a person’, Tula Scientific Bulletin. History. Linguistics, issue 3 (7), pp. 106–119, https://doi.org/10.22405/2712-8407-2021-3-106. (in Russ.)

References

1. Alpatov V. M. Istoriya lingvisticheskikh ucheniy: ucheb. posobiye. 4-ye izd., ispr. i dop. [History of linguistic doctrines: textbook 4th ed., rev. and add.]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury publ., 2005. 368 p. (in Russ.)
2. Arutiunova N. D. Aksiologiya v mekhanizmakh zhizni i yazyka. [Axiology in the mechanisms of life and language]. Problemy strukturnoy lingvistiki [Structural linguistics problems]. Moscow: Izd-vo AN SSSR publ., 1982. Pp. 5–23. (in Russ.)
3. Baeva L. V. Sokhraneniye kul'turnogo naslediya kak voploshcheniye tsennosti traditsii [Preservation of cultural heritage as the embodiment of the value of tradition]. Filosofiya i obshchestvo [Philosophy and society]. No. 1 (65). 2012. Pp. 109–118. (in Russ.)
4. Gavrilova T. I., Kurkina O. S. Dialektnaya leksika kak forma vyrazheniya narodnoy dukhovnoy kul'tury (na materiale kurskikh govorov) [Dialect words as a special form of folk cultural expression (on the material of Kursk dialects)]. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika i pedagogika [Proceedings of South-West State University. Series Linguistics and Pedagogical]. No. 2. 2012. Pp. 149–154. (in Russ.)
5. Galimova D. N. Chelovek v metaforicheskoy dialektnoy kartine mira [Human in the metaphorical dialectal picture of the world]. Vestnik Tomskogo universiteta [Tomsk State University Journal]. No. 316. 2008. Pp. 11–14. (in Russ.)
6. Ganicheva S. A. Dialektnaya yazykovaya kartina mira v sootnoshenii s traditsionnoy kartinoy mira (na primere obraza sinitsy) [Dialect language picture of the world in relation to the traditional picture of the world (on the example of the image of a tit)]. Slovo i tekst v kul'turnom soznanii epokhi: sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Word and text in the cultural consciousness of the era: collection of scientific works]. Vologda: Legiya publ., 2010. Pp. 176–180. (in Russ.)
7. Demidova K. I. Dialektnaya leksika kak istochnik izucheniya dialektnoy yazykovoy kartiny mira v psikholingvisticheskom aspekte [Dialect Lexis as a Source for the Study of the Dialect Language World in the Psycholinguistic Aspect]. Vestnik YuzhnoUral'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika [South Ural State University Bulletin Series: Linguistics]. No. 22 (239). 2011. Pp. 6–9. (in Russ.)
8. Demidova K. I. Yazykovaya kartina mira v regional'nom aspekte (nauchnaya shkola doktora filologicheskikh nauk, professora K. I. Demidovoy) [Linguistic Worldview in the Regional Aspect (The Scientific School of Doctor of Philology, Professor K. I. Demidova)]. Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye v Rossii [Pedagogical Education in Russia]. No. 12. 2015. Pp. 47–51. (in Russ.)
9. Kil'mamatova L. V. Dialektnaya leksika Volovskogo rayona Tul'skoy oblasti kak otrazheniye kul'tury v shirokom ponimanii [Dialect vocabulary of the Volovsky district of the Tula region as a reflection of culture in a broad sense]. Dialektologicheskiy al'manakh [Dialectological almanac]. Voronezh: Voronezhskiy gosudarstvennyy pedagogicheskiy universitet publ., 2019. Pp. 18–22. (in Russ.)
10. Krasovskaia N. A. Dialektnaya leksika sovremennykh govorov kak pokazatel' slozhnosti ikh vnutrenney organizatsii [Vocabulary of Modern Dialects as an Indicator of Their Complex Internal Organization]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya: Rossiyskaya i zarubezhnaya filologiya [Perm University Herald. Russian and Foreign Philology]. Vol. 11. No. 4. 2019. Pp. 16–21. (in Russ.)
11. Krasovskaia N. A. Tul'skiye govory i osobennosti izucheniya dialektnoy leksiki [Tula dialects and peculiarities of studying dialect vocabulary]. Tula: Izd-vo Tul. gos. ped. un-ta im. L. N. Tolstogo publ., 2012. 144 p. (in Russ.)
12. Maslova V. A. Lingvokul'turologiya : uchebnoye posobiye dlya studentov vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy [Linguoculturology: a textbook for students of higher educational institutions]. Moscow: Academia publ., 2001. 208 p. (in Russ.)
URL: https://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Linguist/maslova/01.php (accessed: 10 May 2021). (in Russ.)
13. Nikiforova O. V. Dialektnyy slovar' kak istochnik izucheniya kul'tury regiona (na materiale dialektnogo slovarya Nizhegorodskoy oblasti) [The dialect dictionary as a source of studying the culture of the region (based on the dialect dictionary of the Nizhny Novgorod region)]. Natsional'nyye kody v yazyke i literature. Yazyk i kul'tura : sb. st. po materialam mezhdunar. konf. [National codes in language and literature. Language and culture: a collection of articles based on the materials of the international conference]. N. Novgorod: Dekom publ. 2018. Pp. 201–207. (in Russ.)
14. Pliaskina E. I. Aspekty opisaniya bytovoy leksiki govorov [Everyday Vocabulary of a Dialect and the Aspects of Its Description]. Gumanitarnyy vector [Humanitarian vector]. No. 4. 2009. Pp. 88–91. (in Russ.)
15. Slovar' russkikh narodnykh govorov [Dictionary of Russian folk dialects]. No. 1-47. St. Petersburg: Nauka publ., 1965–2014 Institut lingvisticheskikh issledovaniy RAN: sayt. URL: https://iling.spb.ru/vocabula/srng/srng.html (accessed: 17 May 2021). (in Russ.)