Natalia M. Startseva

Associate Professor, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor of the Chair of the Russian language and literature

Tula State Lev Tolstoy Pedagogical University

(Tula, Russia)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22405/2712-8407-2021-4-100-109

Abstract. Today, one of the most important strategic issues in language education is the question of the text and its educational and upbringing capabilities. The article examines the problems of perception and interpretation of a journalistic text by a young reader, as well as the role and place of the classical journalistic text in the modern educational paradigm. The text, including those related to journalism, allows readers to successfully form important philological competencies, influences the worldview and aesthetic views of the perceiving subject, their moral and ethical ideas, contributes to the replenishment of the emotional repertoire of students. The publicistic texts, the authors of which are classic writers, whose authority is obvious to the reader, should be recognized as the most significant ones for the young reader. This is important because in such a text the personality of the author is extremely significant that is manifested openly in the direct expression of their own position, including thanks to the evaluative vocabulary and syntactic features of the text. However, a modern young person cannot adequately perceive a classical journalistic text created in the last or the century before last, since he needs a detailed linguistic and cultural commentary, due to which the perception of the text will cease to be difficult. The basic commentary to such a publicistic work should contain a detailed explanation of all proper names (names of people, geographical names, names of holidays, works of art, etc.), archaic vocabulary, special words and terms. On the example of the article by A. P. Chekhov, dedicated to N. M. Przhevalsky, analyzed the desired amount of linguoculturological commenting on the text when preparing it for work in the senior classes of secondary schools.
Keywords: publicistic text, anthropocentric paradigm of language education, linguistic and cultural commentary, textual and extra-textual information, text decryption, emotional repertoire of the learner.
Funding: the study was carried out within the framework of the state task of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation on the topic: "Formation of reading competencies in the conditions of digital information redundancy and deficit of emotional repertoire of students".

Full text of the article (PDF)

For citation: Startseva, NM 2021, ‘Linguoculturological commenting on a journalistic text as a necessary component of its interpretation and replenishment of students’ emotional repertoire (based on the article "N.M. Przhevalsky" by A.P. Chekhov)’, Tula Scientific Bulletin. History. Linguistics, issue 4(8), pp. 100–109, https://doi.org/10.22405/2712-8407-2021-4-100-109 (in Russ.)

References

1. Bol'shoy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. (Big encyclopedic dictionary), 1999, 2nd edn, rev., Bol'shaya rossiyskaya entsiklopediya publ., Moscow; Norint publ., St. Petersburg. (In Russ.)
2. Valgina, NS 2003, ‘Teoriia teksta’ (Text theory), Logos publ, Moscow. (In Russ.)
3. Zalevskaya, AA 2001, ‘Tekst i ego ponimanie’ (Text and its understanding), Tver. gos. un-t publ, Tver. (In Russ.)
4. Rybnikova, MA 1985, ‘Ocherki po metodike literaturnogo chteniia: posobie dl'a uchitel'a’ (Essays on the methodology of literary reading), Prosveshchenie publ, Moscow. (In Russ.)
5. Slovar' russkogo iazyka XVIII vek (Dictionary of the Russian language of the 18th century), 1984–1991, YuS Sorokin (ed), Nauka publ, Leningrad, no. 1–6; 1992, Nauka publ., St. Petersburg, no. 7, viewed 20 July 2021, http://febweb.ru/feb/sl18/slov-abc/ (In Russ.)
6. Tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka: 80000 slov i frazeologicheskikh vyrazheniy (Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language: 80,000 words and phraseological expressions), 1995, AZ" publ., Moscow. (In Russ.)
7. Romanov, DA, Startseva, NM & Pechurova EA (comps) 2018, ‘Tul'skii krai v literature: lingvostilisticheskoe i lingvokul'turologi cheskoe issledovanie: monografiia’ (Tula Territory in Literature: Linguo-stylistic and Linguocultural Research: Monograph), Izd-vo TGPU im. L. N. Tolstogo publ., Tula. (In Russ.)
8. Chekhov, AP 1963, ‘Przheval'skii’ (Przhevalsky). Sobranie sochinenii: v 12 t. (Collected Works in 12 volumes). Khudozhestvennaia literature publ, Moscow, vol. 10, 640 p. (In Russ.)
9. Chukovsky, KI 1967, ‘Sobranie sochinenii: v 6 t.’ (Collected Works in 6 volumes), Khudozhestvennaia literature publ,. Moscow, vol. 5, 800 p. (In Russ.)